>>Interesting Information on Mammograms – Mammograms are being abolished in Switzerland

Interesting Information on Mammograms – Mammograms are being abolished in Switzerland

In a perspective piece published in the New England Journal of Medicine, two members of the Swiss Medical Board’s expert panel explained how they reached their conclusions. Three primary factors came into play:

 

1. Outdated Clinical Trials

 

The ongoing debate over mammography screening is based on a “series of re-analyses of the same, predominantly outdated trials.” The first mammography trial began more than 50 years ago and the last trial was in 1991.

 

The mammography benefits that were supposedly found during these trials were prior to the era of modern breast cancer treatment, in which the prognosis of women with breast cancer has improved significantly from even two decades ago. The expert panel questioned:

 

“Could the modest benefit of mammography screening in terms of breast-cancer mortality that was shown in trials initiated between 1963 and 1991 still be detected in a trial conducted today?”

 

2. The Benefits Did Not Clearly Outweigh the Harms

 

The experts noted they were “struck by how nonobvious it was that the benefits of mammography screening outweighed the harms.” They cited a recent study published in British Medical Journal (BMJ) — one of the largest and longest studies of mammography to date — involving 90,000 women followed for 25 years. It found that mammograms have absolutely NO impact on breast cancer mortality. Over the course of the study, the death rate from breast cancer was virtually identical between those who received an annual mammogram and those who did not, while 22 percent of screen-detected invasive breast cancers were over-diagnosed, leading to unnecessary treatment. The experts noted: “This means that 106 of the 44,925 healthy women in the screening group were diagnosed with and treated for breast cancer unnecessarily, which resulted in needless surgical interventions, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or some combination of these therapies.”

 

A Cochrane Collaboration review also found no evidence that mammography screening has an effect on overall mortality, which, taken together, seriously calls into question whether mammography screening really benefits women. According to the authors of the Cochrane review:

 

“If we assume that screening reduces breast cancer mortality by 15% and that overdiagnosis and overtreatment is at 30%, it means that for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will avoid dying of breast cancer and 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily.

 

Furthermore, more than 200 women will experience important psychological distress including anxiety and uncertainty for years because of false positive findings.”

 

3. Women’s Perceptions of Mammography Benefits Do Not Match Reality

 

The experts also said they were “disconcerted” by the profound discrepancy between women’s perceptions of mammography benefits and the actual benefits.

 

In one survey, most women said they believed mammography reduced the risk of breast cancer deaths by at least half and prevented at least 80 deaths per 1,000 women screened. In reality, mammography may, at best, offer a relative risk reduction of 20 percent and prevent in absolute terms only one breast-cancer death per 10,000 women. The experts asked a long overdue question:

 

“How can women make an informed decision if they overestimate the benefit of mammography so grossly?” The sad reality of course, is that they can’t. Many women are still unaware that the science backing the health benefits of mammograms is sorely lacking. Instead of being told the truth, women are guilt-tripped into thinking that skipping their yearly mammogram is the height of irresponsibility. It can be hard to stand your ground against such tactics. After all, you expect health professionals to know what they’re talking about, and to give you the best advice possible.

 

When it comes to cancer prevention, however, many doctors are just as confused and manipulated as the average person on the street because of the relentless industry and media propaganda that downplays or ignores research that dramatically contradicts their profit-based agenda.

 

Indeed, mounting research shows that more women are being harmed by regular mammograms than are saved by them. In light of such facts, avoiding an annual mammogram is hardly an irresponsible act.

 

Ditto for saying “no thanks” to 3D tomosynthesis, which exposes you to an even greater amount of cancer-causing radiation for virtually no additional benefit. Please understand that there are other screening options, each with their own strengths and weaknesses, and you have a right to utilize those options. Also remember that in order to truly avoid breast cancer, you need to focus your attention on actual prevention and not just early detection.

 

Around 90 per cent of all breast cancers can be definitively diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This compares to the combined methods of mammography and ultrasound which yielded a detection rate of just 37.5 per cent. This is the key finding of a study published in the highly respected Journal of Clinical Oncology.

 

Sources:

 

The New England Journal of Medicine April 16, 2014

 

1 Swiss Medical Board December 15, 2013, Systematic Mammography Screening

2 The New England Journal of Medicine April 16, 2014

3 BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g366

4 Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 4;6:CD001877

5 BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g366

6 BMJ 2012;345:e5660

7 National Cancer Institute BRCA 1 and BRCA 2

8 Ann Intern Med. 3 April 2007;146(7):516-526

9 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews October 7, 2009; (4):CD001877

10 Triple-Modality Screening Trial for Familial Breast Cancer Underlines the Importance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Questions the Role of Mammography and Ultrasound Regardless of Patient Mutation Status, Age, and Breast Density.” Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 23. pii: JCO.2014.56.8626. jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/doi/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8626

By | 2017-11-10T05:56:37+00:00 April 13th, 2015|Morag's desk|2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Paula Veenema April 13, 2015 at 11:13 pm

    While alternative options are available such as MRI’s and Thermography, the average person cannot afford these diagnostic tests. My Mother was just diagnosed with breast cancer which was found through her free mammogram, the biopsy results confirming cancerous cells. I am thankful for her initiative at 77 years old to have continued this optional screening, it saved her life.

    • Morag April 16, 2015 at 4:03 pm

      That is true regarding costs! Sad, but true.

      M

Comments are closed.

UPCOMING TRAINING EVENTS

  1. ONCOLOGY AESTHETICS FOUNDATION TRAINING (OAFT) + APPEARANCE RECOVERY : SYDNEY, NSW

    January 19, 2018 @ 8:00 am - January 20, 2018 @ 5:00 pm
  2. ONCOLOGY AESTHETICS : APPEARANCE RECOVERY – SYDNEY, NSW

    January 19, 2018 @ 8:00 am - January 20, 2018 @ 5:00 pm